Compare

Lyssna vs UserTesting

Which platform is the best for user research? Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find the right user research platform for your team.

How users rate Lyssna vs UserTesting

Here’s how customers review Lyssna and UserTesting on G2.com (March 2025).

Rating

Lyssna

UserTesting

Overall rating

4.5/5

4.5/5

Ease of use

9.2/10 🏅

8.5/10

Product direction

9.4/10 🏅

8.1/10

Quality of support

9.4/10 🏅

9/10

Ease of admin

9/10 🏅

8.7/10

Partner in doing business

9.2/10 🏅

8.8/10

Why companies choose Lyssna over UserTesting 

Organizations switching from UserTesting to Lyssna frequently point to several key factors driving their decision.

  1. Frustration with hidden costs. Many former UserTesting customers express disappointment with the platform’s shift to a hidden pricing model. As one G2 reviewer noted, “The pricing went from 'buy credits' to needing to pay for way more than we needed. So it was too expensive to keep

  2. Research democratization barriers. Teams consistently cite the inability to distribute research capabilities across their organization as a key reason for switching. With UserTesting's tiered feature approach, many companies found themselves in situations where only certain teams could access specific research methods.

  3. Difficulty scaling with growth. Growing organizations frequently mention hitting a “research ceiling” with UserTesting. Nancy B., a G2 reviewer, explained: “The pricing doesn’t work for a pre-seed startup...we switched to another service which had the above and the ability to use our own testers at a price we could afford.

Participant quality concerns are also significant. While UserTesting offers a large panel, several reviewers expressed concerns about participant quality and targeting limitations.

These user experiences are reflected in G2 comparison ratings, where Lyssna outperforms UserTesting across key metrics:

  • Ease of use: 9.2/10 vs 8.5/10

  • Product direction: 9.3/10 vs 8.1/10

  • Quality of support: 9.4/10 vs 9.0/10

  • Business partnership: 9.2/10 vs 8.8/10

Lyssna vs UserTesting: Key differences


Research method availability

UserTesting restricts essential UX research methods like card sorting and tree testing to their highest-tier Ultimate plan. Lyssna takes a different approach, providing nearly all research methodologies on every plan – even the free plan. This means teams can conduct comprehensive research with card sorting, tree testing, first click testing, preference testing, five second testing, prototype testing, and surveys regardless of their budget or plan level.


Superior participant panel

Quality research depends on quality participants. Lyssna’s panel includes 690,000+ participants across 124 countries with detailed targeting across 395+ demographic attributes. UserTesting’s panel covers only 30+ countries and offers limited targeting options on basic plans. Additionally, Lyssna provides automatic replacement for unsatisfactory responses, ensuring research quality without additional costs or delays.


Transparent pricing structure

Unlike UserTesting, which requires contacting sales for pricing information and has no free option, Lyssna publishes clear pricing on their website (Basic: $75/month, Pro: $175/month). Lyssna offers a comprehensive free plan and a strategic mid-tier Pro plan to help teams scale gradually, along with consistent $1/credit panel recruitment pricing across all plans, regardless


Flexible workflows and integrations

Both platforms integrate with essential tools like Figma, Zoom, and calendars, but Lyssna offers greater flexibility in test creation and editing. While UserTesting provides native video conferencing, Lyssna's approach to test design allows teams to adapt their research more dynamically as needs evolve, creating a more responsive research process that adjusts to real-world testing scenarios.

Lyssna vs UserTesting: Feature comparison

Feature

Lyssna

UserTesting

Free plan features

Unlimited tests

green checkmark
green checkmark

Seats included

green checkmark
green checkmark

Pay-per-use panel credits

green checkmark
green checkmark

Research

Card sorting

green checkmark

Ultimate plan only

Conditional logic

green checkmark
green checkmark

First click testing

green checkmark
green checkmark

Five second testing

green checkmark
green checkmark

Live website testing

green checkmark
green checkmark

Prototype testing with Figma

green checkmark
green checkmark

Surveys

green checkmark
green checkmark

Tree testing

green checkmark

Ultimate plan only

User interviews

green checkmark
green checkmark

Participant recruitment

Research panel access

green checkmark
green checkmark

Advanced panel targeting criteria

green checkmark
green checkmark

Limited on basic plans

Panel credits

Pay-per-use

Subscription-based

Custom screener

green checkmark
green checkmark

Limited on basic plans

Self recruitment

green checkmark
green checkmark

Analysis and reporting

Heatmaps

green checkmark
green checkmark

Video recordings

green checkmark
green checkmark

CSV exports

green checkmark
green checkmark

Moderated interviews

Microsoft integration

green checkmark
green checkmark

Google calendar integration

green checkmark
green checkmark

Zoom integration

green checkmark
green checkmark

Video transcript

green checkmark
green checkmark

Support

Email support

green checkmark
green checkmark

Live chat

green checkmark
green checkmark

Help center

green checkmark
green checkmark

Pricing flexibility

Free plan

green checkmark
green checkmark

Basic plan

green checkmark
green checkmark

Pro plan

green checkmark
green checkmark

Enterprise plan

green checkmark
green checkmark

Security

SOC 2 compliant

green checkmark
green checkmark

GDPR compliant

green checkmark
green checkmark

SSO

green checkmark
green checkmark

Summary: Making the right choice


When it comes down to it, choosing between Lyssna and UserTesting is more than feature checklists – it's about how those features support research goals.


Lyssna makes sense if users:


  • Want a variety of research methods available without requiring an enterprise plan.

  • Need flexibility in research volume without monthly study limits.

  • Value detailed participant targeting across 395+ demographics and psychographics.

  • Want a middle-tier pricing option between Basic and Enterprise.

  • Prioritize higher-rated customer support (9.4/10 vs 9.0/10).

  • Need a transparent pricing model.

  • Are looking for more cost-effective panel recruitment ($1/credit).


UserTesting might be a better fit if users:


  • Are already integrated into their workflow.

  • Value their native video conferencing capabilities.

  • Need their specific AI-powered analysis tools.

  • Have the budget for enterprise-level pricing.


Both platforms offer robust usability testing features and support continuous research – the main differences lie in pricing structure, feature accessibility across plans, and the depth of participant targeting options.

Frequently asked questions

Can Lyssna be tried before committing?
minus icon
minus icon
How do Lyssna and UserTesting compare on pricing?
minus icon
minus icon
What support can I expect from Lyssna?
minus icon
minus icon
How long does it take to learn Lyssna compared to UserTesting?
minus icon
minus icon
What's the difference in participant recruitment quality?
minus icon
minus icon

Try for free today

Join over 320,000+ marketers, designers, researchers, and product leaders who use Lyssna to make data-driven decisions.

No credit card required

4.5/5 rating