Compare

Lyssna vs Userlytics

Which platform is the best for user research in 2025? Compare features, pricing, and capabilities to find the right user research platform for your team.

How users rate Lyssna vs Userlytics

Here’s how customers review Lyssna and Userlytics on G2.com (March 2025).

Rating

Lyssna

Userlytics

Overall rating

4.5/5 🏅

4.4/5

Ease of use

9.2/10 🏅

8.1/10

Product direction

9.3/10 🏅

8.9/10

Quality of support

9.4/10

9.5/10

Meets requirements

8.6/10 🏅

8.4/10

Partner in doing business

9.2/10 🏅

9.3/10

Why companies choose Lyssna over Userlytics 

Organizations switching from Userlytics to Lyssna frequently point to three key factors driving their decision.

  1. Transparent credit pricing system. Reviews consistently highlight dissatisfaction with Userlytics’ credit pricing model, which can lead to unused credits and difficulty predicting research costs. Lyssna's straightforward pricing model when recruiting from the panel ($1USD = 1 credit) eliminates these budgeting headaches and provides better value for research teams.

  2. Seamless moderated research experience. Teams consistently cite difficulties with Userlytics’ moderated research capabilities as a reason for switching. Reviews indicate that while Userlytics offers potential, it often falls short in supporting the natural flow of moderated research sessions. Lyssna’s more reliable interview functionality and integration with tools like Zoom and Microsoft Teams creates a smoother experience for both researchers and participants.

  3. Democratized access to research methods. Organizations frequently mention feature restrictions as a primary reason for switching. Userlytics limits essential research methods like tree testing and card sorting to higher-priced plans, creating barriers for teams with limited budgets. Lyssna’s approach of offering core research and testing methods on all plans, including the free tier, makes comprehensive user research accessible to organizations regardless of size or budget.

    These sentiments are reflected in G2 comparison ratings, where Lyssna outperforms Userlytics across key metrics:

    • Ease of use: 9.2/10 vs 8.1/10

    • Product direction: 9.3/10 vs 8.9/10

    • Meets requirements: 8.6/10 vs 8.4/10

Lyssna vs Userlytics: Key differences


Research method flexibility

Lyssna provides greater flexibility in how research methods can be used and combined. Users can easily include different test sections (like first click testing, preference testing, or surveys) in the same study. Userlytics offers solid testing capabilities but with more rigid structures, making it harder to create hybrid research approaches or customize test flows to meet specific research questions.


Panel quality

Lyssna’s participant panel includes over 690,000 individuals globally, with advanced targeting options across 395+ demographic attributes. This allows for precise audience selection and more relevant research insights. Userlytics offers a larger panel of over 2 million participants but with more basic targeting capabilities, which can make it challenging to find specific demographics for niche research needs.


Transparent pricing structure

Lyssna offers a clear tiered pricing structure with a free plan, Basic plan, Pro plan, and Enterprise options. This provides a smooth scaling path for growing teams. Userlytics uses a different approach with Project Based, Enterprise, and Limitless plans when accessing the panel, and Premium and Advanced panels when self-recruiting – each with varying levels of access to features and participant options, and typically at a higher price point.


User experience and ease of use

Lyssna scores significantly higher on ease of use (9.2/10 compared to Userlytics’ 8.1/10 on G2), reflecting its more intuitive interface and streamlined workflows. This makes Lyssna more accessible to team members with varying levels of research experience, encouraging broader adoption and more consistent research practices across organizations. Userlytics, while powerful, has a steeper learning curve that can slow down research initiatives and limit team-wide adoption.

Lyssna vs Userlytics: Feature comparison

Feature

Lyssna

UserTesting

Free plan features

Unlimited tests

green checkmark
green checkmark

Seats included

green checkmark
green checkmark

Pay-per-use panel credits

green checkmark
green checkmark

Research

Card sorting

green checkmark
green checkmark

Conditional logic

green checkmark
green checkmark

First click testing

green checkmark
green checkmark

Five second testing

green checkmark
green checkmark

Live website testing

green checkmark
green checkmark

Prototype testing with Figma

green checkmark
green checkmark

Surveys

green checkmark
green checkmark

Tree testing

green checkmark
green checkmark

User interviews

green checkmark
green checkmark

Participant recruitment

Research panel access

green checkmark
green checkmark

Advanced panel targeting criteria

green checkmark
green checkmark

Panel credits

Pay-per-use

Credits included in some paid plans (Admin roles can also request credit purchases)

Custom screener

green checkmark
green checkmark

Self recruitment

green checkmark
green checkmark

Analysis and reporting

Heatmaps

green checkmark
green checkmark

Video recordings

green checkmark
green checkmark

CSV exports

green checkmark
green checkmark

Moderated interviews

Microsoft integration

green checkmark
green checkmark

Google calendar integration

green checkmark
green checkmark

Zoom integration

green checkmark
green checkmark

(Includes picture-in-picture video)

Video transcript

green checkmark
green checkmark

Support

Email support

green checkmark
green checkmark

Live chat

green checkmark
green checkmark

Help center

green checkmark
green checkmark

Pricing flexibility

Free plan

green checkmark
green checkmark

Basic plan

green checkmark
green checkmark

Pro plan

green checkmark
green checkmark

Enterprise plan

green checkmark
green checkmark

Security

SOC 2 compliant

green checkmark
green checkmark

GDPR compliant

green checkmark
green checkmark

SSO

green checkmark
green checkmark

Making the right choice: Lyssna or Userlytics?


When deciding between these platforms, consider which features best align with your specific research needs.


Lyssna makes sense if users:


  • Want research methods available without requiring an enterprise plan.

  • Need flexibility in research volume without monthly study limits.

  • Value detailed participant targeting across 395+ demographics.

  • Want a middle-tier pricing option between Basic and Enterprise.

  • Prioritize higher-rated ease of use (9.2/10 vs 8.1/10).

  • Need comprehensive interview features with generous transcription hours.


UserTesting might be a better fit if users:


  • Need TestFlight and Android testing capabilities.

  • Prioritize their transcription service.

  • Need their AI UX analysis or sentiment analysis tools.


Both platforms offer robust usability testing features and support continuous research – the main differences lie in the pricing structure, feature accessibility across plans, and the depth of participant targeting options.

Frequently asked questions

Can users try Lyssna before committing?
minus icon
minus icon
How do Lyssna and Userlytics compare on pricing?
minus icon
minus icon
What support can users expect from Lyssna?
minus icon
minus icon
How long does it take to learn Lyssna compared to Userlytics?
minus icon
minus icon
What's the difference in participant recruitment quality?
minus icon
minus icon

Try for free today

Join over 320,000+ marketers, designers, researchers, and product leaders who use Lyssna to make data-driven decisions.

No credit card required

4.5/5 rating